Friday, 26 January 2018

The 'Sexologists' (part one)



Ask yourselves this question...

 'Why would a bunch of sexologists block me on twitter and why would a convicted paedophile warn them about me?'



The well known sexologist...


 The well known paedophile...



"We make sure..many do"







Nigel Oldfield aka 'GhandisOPhoenix' Convicted paedophile profile on the UK database of sex offenders





Nigel Oldfield's blog

 Oh and Tom O'Carroll (A former chairman of PIE) Thinks Nigel is great..





 This question and more will be answered and understood as you read this blog...



Sexologists (Or Fuckologists, as John Money liked to say) are the disciples of Kinsey. They are the therapists, psychologists, teachers, relationship counsellors and educators who are drawn to this profession, because they themselves are perverts..(Sorry, I meant folks with unusual sexual interests) Who are infiltrating academia and flooding science, education, law and health agencies with the 'Kinsey' ideology; That is to normalise, make acceptable and justify the beliefs and wishes of a sexual psychopath.

 'Kinsey’s fundamental premise was that any and all forms of expression of sexuality (including homosexuality, bisexuality, transvestitism, paedophilia, incest, sadomasochism, and bestiality) were naturaland even necessary – for people to have full lives as human beings'


They can also make good money from sexology. The following two examples depict salaries as a sex therapist in the UK and in the US..

In the UK...


And in the USA...


 Not only can they make a lucrative income from the therapy side, but also from writing books and articles. They have invested interests in the porn and sex toy/attire industries and are often sponsored or paid to write numerous articles such as defending the porn industry 'Porn isn’t addictive, and it’s probably good for you'

 Why sexologists need pornography



Sexologists need pornography because, not only do they themselves, want to enjoy every depraved sex act imaginable (That is now the mainstream in porn) They use every genre of  extreme pornography as a 'Teaching tool' within SAR (Sexual Attitude Reassessment) training and certified courses which are mandatory if you wish to become a sexologist. (Kinsey used this method with his own staff by coercing them and other sadomasochistic performers to participate and be filmed in pornography and showing imported and illegal pornography from Denmark and Mafia funded pornography)


 This book is out on the fifth of June






'Sexual attitude reassessment' (Or complete immersed desensitisation to the acceptability of all sexual depravities)






AASECT Requirements for Sex Therapist Certification








Sexology students also have to engage in BDSM 





The following is just one of many worldwide companies that facilitates SAR courses.
 
 Sar in the city

Nice happy layout for sexual torture!






















So of course AASECT board members are Kinsey enthusiasts, participate in BDSM and other 'Alternative sex' lifestyles and believe that the diagnostic and statistical manuals for the mental disorders; over- pathologize BDSM and organise efforts to have consensual sexual sadism/masochism removed from the paraphilias section of DSM - 5. They also deny that 'Sex/porn addiction' exists.








As are the sexologists...

And the BDSM that they speak of, does not constitute a bit of hair pulling or a little spanking. We are talking serious sexual sadism and it is often women who are subjected to this sexual violence. (There is evidence that there may be a link between women with BPD, child abuse, complex PTSD and sexual masochism)




Here is an example of a woman who was a victim of sexual violence and received no justice.
This is about PTSD, anger, rage, self abuse and a re-inaction of the suffering.




[Link]









This sex therapist is a dominant, sexual sadist..








Here is Galen Fous being interviewed for a series of ( #NoMoreSexShame ) by David Ley on you tube. Sexologists attempt to shut down conversations and comments by anti-porn/sexual violence activists/feminists/organisations - By claiming 'Sex-negative' and 'Sex-shaming' of
'Kinksters' (The other word for sexual sadists)

5 years old!














Here are a few images taken from a 'Kink' pornographic website. As you can plainly see, this is not a bit of 'Slap and tickle' as the sexologists and some media promote. this is the humiliation, degradation and blatant sexual torture of women. Kink often uses water boarding and electrocution as a form of torture (All forms of torture are banned in the human rights act) Yet it's okay to torture women on a pornography site..









This website was recommended to the young female readers of Cosmopolitan magazine.





Here are some images posted by one of the performers of 'Kink' after a 'shoot'



So, what we can see since Kinsey and up to the present day, is a pattern of the promotion, normalisation and acceptability of  'Alternative sexual interests' Which include -
 'Adult entertainment'  'Kink'  'Polyamory'  'Non-Monogamous relationships' 'Cuckoldry' 'Anal play' 'Swinging' 'Sex work' 'Adult/child relationships' and 'Zoophilia' Not just to adults, but to our next generations.

In other words...

'Extreme/hard-core pornography' 'Sexual sadism' 'Intense promiscuity' 'Cheating' 'Anal sex' 'Orgies' 'Prostitution' 'Paedophilia' and 'Bestiality'

Taylor Kohut Phd




Sexologists are denying that pornography is harmful - To the teen and women victims within it (Please see my blog here) and to the men that consume it, who can become addicted and desensitised to such a degree, that they have to seek more extreme material, which can sometimes lead to child abuse imagery. They can also suffer from erectile dysfunction, distress and anxiety that they are in conflict with what they are being aroused by. There are also paedophiles who use 'Adult material' to groom children, pimps that use pornography to teach and incite fear into their victims and sex offenders who are incited by the fantasies of pornography and commit sexual assaults, rapes and murders. (See here)


The following related images and text are taken from some of the most prominent sexologists tweets, websites and articles. And of course, they all know each other and collaborate on articles,research and get together at sex events/seminars etc. They are also followed and liked on twitter by pornhub, playboy and paedophiles. It's when you put everything together that you get a real picture.

(They are random, but will give you a general idea)

Taylor Kohut and associates

Says a pervert..

Taylor Kohut is 'Harnessing the collective power of amateur porn scientists' in his 'Porn Genome project...







And let's not forget to inject some humour here...









Debra Soh












Dr. Eric Sprankle






This is when Dr. Sprankle blocked me on twitter..




Dr. Justin Lehmiller











Dr. Justin Lemiller's blog




This is a retweet of Dr, David Ley who creates the #NoMoreShame videos on you tube. This guy he interviewed is Dan Savage
who is an activist for the LGBT community He writes Savage Love, an internationally syndicated relationship and sex advice column and podcast. He also coordinates the annual Hump pornography festival..





And stated this about children being sexual...


Lovely, isn't he....
Dan Savage and friend






Heather McPherson









Michael Aaron Phd



















Oh and this last one...

Dr. Martha Tara Lee






'Baby-Gasm'

This is Doctor Martha Tara Lee's you tube channel and this is her daughter who Doctor Martha filmed and instructed to imitate an orgasm. This child writhes about, makes sexual moans and finishes with body spasms..



11 comments:

  1. You are crazy, misinformed and completely mistaken in your interpretation of what sexologists do. Get your mind out of the gutter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. The evidence and the deranged crap spouted out of these "sexperts'" mouths suggest otherwise.
      How about you get your mind out of the gutter? Woukd help to lay off the porn too, which you fuckologists so promote and defend.

      Delete
  2. What ignorant and incorrect drivel...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correction: Absolutely correct and the absolute truth.

      Are you too being paid by the multi-billion dollar porn industry? Or the corrupt brain-rotting Alfred Kinsey Institute?

      Delete
  3. Let the truth be known.
    Not to mention, Dan Savage mentioned to an asker in Straight newspapers to go incognito the next time he uses porn. That way his wife who gets hurt by his porn use wouldn't know he's still using porn. Such a wonderful relationship advice...hiding things from one's partner. What a "sexpert".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. In all seriousness though. Fuck those pro-porners and whoever else is undermining the experiences of exited survivors and those who have been virtually cheated on as well as traumatized by a (ex)partner's porn use.

      Delete
    3. If anyone wants evidence of Dan Savage's shitty advice to enable that man to continually cheat on his wife with pixels I have a picture of it.

      Delete
  4. Dear folks who think viewing porn isn't cheating...

    If porn isn't cheating then why does a lot of it contain themes of infidelity?
    If porn isn't cheating then why do so many partners hide their use of it?
    If porn isn't cheating then why is it against monogamy?
    If porn isn't cheating then why are there girls and women who are heart broken and have betrayal trauma by their partner's porn use?

    ...because porn IS cheating in a virtual and psychological form within the context of expectations as well monogamous relationships and marriages.

    Why is it mostly the bad guys who have a PhD in psychology and sexuality but not the good guys? Makes me wonder.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi author of article. Think I found a grammatical error.

    "Sexologists are denying that pornography is harmless-"

    Unless you were being sarcastic here, I believe you meant "Sexologists aren't denying that pornography is harmless-" or "Sexologists are denying that pornography is harmful-".

    ReplyDelete